I
IOI070316
Friday, March 16 Dialogue Group 0701-04.
Dialogue Group 0701-04
(fourth session) starts at noon addressing "Hidden Rules" at
Fourth Street Baptist Church. See
http://homepages.wmich.edu/~ljohnson/Payne.pdf.
You are stilll welcome to join these dialogue groups if you
wish. Contact Berrien.
Telephone number at the church is 706-324-2055.
Contact: H. Berrien Zettler 706-324-6363
Tuesday, March 20, Dialogue Group 0702-04
Dialogue Group 0702-04
(fourth session) begins at 5:30 pm on Tuesday evening, March
20 at the Holy Family Church. Discussion continues on the
"Hidden Rules..
Contact: H. Berrien Zettler 706-324-6363
Monday, March 26, E Pluribus Unum
The second of the E Pluribus Unum series is
Monday, March 26 at 7:00 pm. The audience gets a chance
to ask questions of the experts about the one document with
which we should all be familiar - the Constitution of the
United States.
Plan now to attend at the Main Library on Macon Road.
Contact: Max Roth 706-315-4875
Down the Road:
Community Prayer Breakfast April 17, 7:30 am.
The Mayor's Prayer Breakfast idea started in America in 1952
to garner support from the diverse populations for prayer
for cities. In Columbus, the Valley Interaction Ministry
began Prayer Breakfasts in the late 1980's that brought
together similar groups to support the idea.
Beginning with former Mayor Frank Martin who revived the
"Mayor's Prayer Breakfast" idea in 1991, subsequent Mayors
have supported the idea until, under Mayor Bob Poydasneff,
it became the Community Prayer Breakfast. The next
Community Prayer Breakfast is Tuesday, April 14, 2007.
Contact: Rosa Stanback 706-689-7277
Here is some food for thought.

·
Dialogue
is collaborative: two or more sides work together toward
common understanding.
-
Debate is oppositional: two sides oppose each other and
attempt to prove each other wrong.
· In
dialogue, finding common ground is the goal.
-
In debate, winning is the goal.
·
In
dialogue, one listens to the other side(s) in order to
understand, find meaning and find agreement.
-
In debate, one listens to the other side in order to
find flaws and to counter its arguments.
· Dialogue
enlarges and possibly changes a participants point of view.
-
Debate affirms a participant's own point of view.
· Dialogue
reveals assumptions for re-evaluation.
-
Debate defends assumptions as truth.
· Dialogue
causes introspection on ones own position.
-
Debate causes critique of the other position.
· Dialogue
opens the possibility of reaching a better solution than any
of the original solutions.
-
Debate defends one's own positions as the best solution
and excludes other solutions.
· Dialogue
creates an open-minded attitude: an openness to being wrong
and an openness to change.
-
Debate creates a close-minded attitude, a determination
to be right.
· In
dialogue, one submits ones best thinking, knowing that other
people's reflections will help improve it rather than
destroy it.
-
In debate, one submits one's best thinking and defends
it against challenge to show that it is right.
· Dialogue
calls for temporarily suspending one's beliefs.
-
Debate calls for investing wholeheartedly in one's
beliefs.
· In
dialogue, one searches for basic agreements.
-
In debate, one searches for glaring differences.
· In
dialogue one searches for strengths in the other positions.
-
In debate one searches for flaws and weaknesses in the
other position.
· Dialogue
involves a real concern for the other person and seeks to
not alienate or offend.
-
Debate involves a countering of the other position
without focusing on feelings or relationship and often
belittles or deprecates the other person.
· Dialogue
assumes that many people have pieces of the answer and that
together they can put them into a workable solution.
-
Debate assumes that there is a right answer and that
someone has it.
· Dialogue
remains open-ended.
-
Debate implies a conclusion.
Adapted from a paper prepared by Shelley Berman, which was
based on discussions of the Dialogue Group of the Boston
Chapter of Educators for Social Responsibility (ESR).